The mass displacement of Gazans will only fuel Hamas’s extremist ideology

As the second phase of the Gaza cease-fire approaches, Egyptian Senator

Mohamed Farid warns that Israeli proposals for the forced displacement of Gaza’s population would not weaken Hamas — but rather strengthen its extremist narrative.

Farid argues that Prime Minister Netanyahu’s lack of a credible postwar governance plan for Gaza has prolonged Hamas’s grip on the enclave, jeopardized hostages, and fueled regional instability. He calls for an Arab-led, Palestinian-owned transition to provide Gazans with a political alternative to Hamas, rather than punishing civilians through mass expulsion.

Key Points

  1. A Cease-Fire Under Strain
  • The first phase of the cease-fire ends March 1, but negotiations for phase two face serious obstacles.
  • Despite Hamas’s weakened military capacity, it still holds political control over Gaza.
  • Netanyahu has no “day after” plan, rejecting Palestinian Authority involvement and leaving a dangerous power vacuum.
  1. Netanyahu’s Political Calculations
  • Netanyahu replaced Mossad head David Barnea with political ally Ron Dermer as lead negotiator, consolidating control over talks.
  • His hardline stance aligns with far-right figures Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, whose support is vital to his coalition.
  • By prolonging the conflict, Netanyahu risks endangering hostages and escalating regional tensions.
  1. Why Mass Displacement Backfires
  • Displacement blames civilians for Hamas’s actions, despite evidence of widespread discontent with Hamas in Gaza.
  • Arab Barometer data (pre–Oct 7) showed:
    • 72% of Gazans viewed Hamas as corrupt.

○ 44% expressed no trust in the group.

  • Forced migration would:
    • Reinforce Hamas’s “resistance” image.

○ Destabilize neighboring states.

○ Fuel anti-Israel sentiment globally.

  • Historical precedent — the Nakba of 1948 — shows displacement can seed generations of militancy.
  1. Breaking Hamas’s Grip
  • Military defeat is not enough — Hamas must lose legitimacy.
  • Gaza’s reconstruction must be tied to:

○ Technocratic governance free from factional control.

○ Rule-of-law reforms in education, law enforcement, and media.

○ Economic opportunities to reduce radicalization.

  • Displacement undermines this goal by entrenching Hamas’s narrative.
  1. A Strategic Alternative
  • Farid calls for an Arab-led, Palestinian-owned transitional process to govern Gaza postwar.
  • International actors should help build Palestinian institutions and deliver aid directly to civilians.
  • Regional cooperation is key to:

○ Restoring stability.

○ Protecting Israel’s long-term security.

○ Offering Gazans hope beyond extremist rule.

Core Values & Themes

  • Rejecting collective punishment as a counterterrorism strategy.
  • Empowering civilians as the foundation for lasting peace.
  • Regional cooperation over unilateral military dominance.
  • Institution-building as the pathway to stability and security.

more